Frequently Asked Questions About Slip and Fall Cases in Lansing

How long do I have to file a slip and fall claim in Lansing, Michigan?

Michigan generally gives you three years from the date of injury to file a personal injury lawsuit. Different deadlines apply if the property is owned by a governmental entity or if the injured person was a minor. Talk to a lawyer well before the three-year mark so that investigation and evidence preservation can begin while the proof is still fresh.

What happens to my claim if I was partially at fault for my own fall?

Under Michigan’s modified comparative negligence rule, your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault, and you cannot recover non-economic damages if a jury finds you more than 50% responsible. The exact percentage is a contested issue in most cases. A lawyer’s job is to put your conduct in context.

How much is a Lansing slip and fall case actually worth?

Value depends on injury severity, medical bills, lost income, future care needs, and the strength of liability proof. There is no average dollar figure that meaningfully applies to a new case. We give realistic ranges only after reviewing the records, the incident report, and any video evidence.

Do I really need a lawyer to handle a slip and fall?

Minor injuries that resolve quickly can sometimes be handled directly with the insurer. Anything beyond that benefits from legal representation because premises liability defenses are technical, and adjusters routinely undervalue claims when no lawyer is involved. Our free consultation will tell you which side of that line your case is on.

Can I sue a Lansing business or landlord if I fell on their property?

Yes, if the elements of premises liability are met. Businesses, landlords, property management companies, and even snow removal contractors can all be appropriate defendants depending on the facts. We identify every potential defendant during the pre-suit investigation.

What if the property owner says the hazard was open and obvious?

That is a defense argument, not a final answer. Michigan courts have narrowed the open and obvious doctrine, and exceptions exist for hazards that are effectively unavoidable or have special aspects that make them unreasonably dangerous. Whether the doctrine actually bars your claim is a factual question developed during the case.